habermas dialogic democracy: relation factors

نویسندگان

عبدالرحمن عالم

استاد گروه علوم سیاسی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران علی پورپاشا کاسین

دانشجوی دکتری گروه علوم سیاسی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

modernity has been interpreted from different angles. scholars such as derida and lyotard talk about the end of modernity and the beginning of a new era called post-modernism, though thinkers like habermas do not believe in that.habermas who do not believe in the end of modernity and the beginning of post-modernism, finds modernism as the only way to human liberty who has chosen a wrong path and asserts that its superficial face should be reconstructed. in the search to find a solution for this situation, habermas proposes two matters: “dialog in the public domain” and “dialogic democracy theory”. his theory has attracted criticisms which are of considerable importance in political thinking domain. lyotard criticized habermas’s “dialogic democracy theory”, particularly the concept of oriented integration in this theory.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

the relation between islam and democracy: case study of deep democracy and committed democracy

in this essay is trying to study the relation between islam and democracy in model of deep democracy and commmitted democracy. thus, i study this relationin on seven factors of concepts of democracy (political or philosophical), awareness from outside, multi approach to democracy, communinty nd self interaction, communiction, situated self and pluralism, that are beyond of current liberal democ...

متن کامل

The Habermas-gadamer Debate

ly negated on the basis of a.false c.laim t.. o superiority. ~~ciallife-; the-symmetrkaJ..rc1atioll-betweenpartners in a game is a more apnnooer1 than that ofdoctor~patient.Everyone IS on relatively equal terms in the gallle..in that there are no privileged knowers. There is, however~anlmder­ lying consensus which expresses the ontological primacy of tradition and which is the condition of all ...

متن کامل

Marcuse & Habermas on New Science

Marx's meaning of materialism as well as the extent of Hegel's influence on his thought has been in the center of controversy among Marxists ever since the publication in 1923 of Lukdcs' History and Class Consciousness and Korsch's Marxism and Philosophy with the Frankfurt school, including Marcuse, embracing the Hegelian interpretation. The controversy has resurfaced within the Frankfurt schoo...

متن کامل

investigating the philosophical foundations of habermas’ political thoughts: a deliberative approach for democracy

abstract the investigation of habermas’s political ideas of philosophical perspective and measuring his philosophical principles ratio, which is the deliberative democracy, is a purpose of this study that will be followed.  on the one hand, the importance of this issue is this that represents the new readings of democratic standards and on the other hand, consolidates one type of the democracy ...

متن کامل

Representing dialogic argumentation

Dialogic argumentation is a crucial component in many computational domains, and forms a core component of argumentation theory. This paper compares two approaches to dialogue that have grown from two different disciplines; the descriptive–normative approach of applied philosophy, and the formal, implemented approach of computer science. The commonalities between the approaches are explored in ...

متن کامل

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023